Key Points
- Corporate registry certificates and corporate seal certificates issued by the Legal Affairs Bureau are Japanese public documents; company-prepared Articles of Incorporation, registers, minutes, powers of attorney, and similar records require separate private-document analysis.
- An eligible public-document original may be eligible for a direct MOFA apostille, but attaching a translation to the public document changes the document set and may change its authentication treatment.
- Corporate registry certificates and corporate seal certificates have different request rules: corporate registry certificates are publicly obtainable, while corporate seal certificates are subject to representative or authorized-agent procedures and current Legal Affairs Bureau requirements.
- The receiving party determines the required corporate record, certification method, translation form, recency, and any additional formality. Our work is limited to the Japan-side document workflow.
Japanese Corporate Documents We Handle
Legal Affairs Bureau Records and Company-Prepared DocumentsA corporate registry certificate (certificate of registered matters / 登記事項証明書) is issued by the Legal Affairs Bureau. The Commercial Registration system provides different certificate types depending on the information required. The principal categories include current matters certificates (現在事項証明書), historical matters certificates (履歴事項証明書), closed matters certificates (閉鎖事項証明書), and representative matters certificates (代表者事項証明書). A receiving party should identify what it needs to prove — for example current registered information, historical changes, or current representative authority — before the certificate type is selected.
“Tokibo tohon” is a traditional expression still used colloquially. Under the current commercial registration system, the document is issued as a certificate of registered matters.
The Articles of Incorporation (teikan / 定款) are constitutional company documents. For overseas use, it is important to identify which version is being requested — for example an original instrument, a current company-held version, a certified copy, or another copy — and whether any notarial certification already exists. The underlying company-prepared document is not treated in the same way as a Legal Affairs Bureau-issued registry certificate. If authentication of the Articles themselves, a copy certification, a signature, or another private-document element is required, the applicable notarial and MOFA steps must be determined from the actual document and authentication target.
Foreign receiving parties may use terms such as articles, constitution, charter, memorandum, or similar expressions. Those terms should not be treated as exact Japanese legal equivalents without checking the requested evidence. Shareholder registers, registers of officers, board and shareholders' meeting minutes, powers of attorney, and company-prepared certificates are likewise reviewed as private documents.
| Document | Issued / Prepared by | Classification | Japan-Side Authentication Consideration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Historical matters certificate (履歴事項証明書) | Legal Affairs Bureau | Public | Eligible original may qualify for a direct MOFA apostille where requirements are met | Use where historical registered information is required |
| Current matters certificate (現在事項証明書) | Legal Affairs Bureau | Public | Eligible original may qualify for a direct MOFA apostille where requirements are met | Use where current registered information is required |
| Representative matters certificate (代表者事項証明書) | Legal Affairs Bureau | Public | Eligible original may qualify for a direct MOFA apostille where requirements are met | Records matters concerning current representative authority |
| Closed matters certificate (閉鎖事項証明書) | Legal Affairs Bureau | Public | Eligible original may qualify for a direct MOFA apostille where requirements are met | Use only where closed/historical registry information is specifically required |
| Corporate seal certificate | Legal Affairs Bureau | Public | Eligible original may qualify for a direct MOFA apostille where requirements are met | Request rules differ from ordinary registry certificates; representative/agent procedure must be confirmed. See our seal certificate page |
| Articles of Incorporation | Company / existing notarial record depending on version | Private-document material | Authentication target must be confirmed | Original/current/copy/certified-copy status matters |
| Shareholder register / register of officers | Company | Private | Authentication target must be confirmed | Preparer, signing method, and originality reviewed individually |
| Board / shareholders' meeting minutes | Company | Private | Authentication target must be confirmed | Signatories, dates, and originality reviewed individually |
| Power of attorney / company-prepared certificate | Company / representative | Private | Signature, authority, copy/original and certification requirements must be confirmed | Format and certification requirements confirmed against the receiving party's instructions |
Corporate registry certificates are public records. Under current Legal Affairs Bureau procedures, anyone may request a corporate registry certificate by identifying the company and paying the applicable fee.
A corporate seal certificate is different. The company representative is the person entitled to request it, although an agent request is possible. Current Legal Affairs Bureau procedures, including use of the corporate seal card for applicable paper requests, must be confirmed before we accept procurement handling.
Accordingly, procurement of a registry certificate and procurement of a corporate seal certificate should not be described as the same “POA-based” procedure.
Public and Private Corporate Documents
Identify the Document and Authentication Target FirstEven among “company documents,” a registry certificate issued by the Legal Affairs Bureau and a company-prepared record are treated differently on the Japan side. The classification and the authentication target are confirmed before any workflow is selected.
MOFA treats a public document with a translation attached as a private-document set. Do not bind or otherwise combine the translation with the public original before the authentication target and submission format have been confirmed.
If only the original Legal Affairs Bureau certificate requires an apostille, the original public document and the Certified Translation should generally be treated as separate components unless the receiving party instructs otherwise.
Common Corporate Evidence Requests
The Requested Evidence Matters More Than the Destination CountryConfirm the Receiving Party's Written Requirements
Document Type · Certification · Translation · Recency · FormatThe destination country alone does not determine the required Japan-side process. Banks, registries, CSPs, law firms, courts, regulators, and counterparties may apply different requirements even within the same country.
- The exact corporate record requested
- The fact to be proved
- Original, certified copy, or PDF
- Any document-age requirement
- Whether apostille or other authentication is required
- The authentication target
- Translation requirements
- Who must certify the copy or translation
- Whether the receiving party provides its own form
Singapore (ACRA). For Singapore foreign-company branch registration, current ACRA guidance specifies particular certifiers for the certificate of incorporation or equivalent record, the foreign company's constitution, and certified English translations. For translations made outside Singapore, ACRA currently identifies specified certifiers such as an official holding an equivalent registry role in the home jurisdiction, a notary public or sworn translator in the home jurisdiction, or a Singapore consular officer. Apostille Japan's own Certification of Translation Accuracy should therefore not be presented as automatically satisfying ACRA's certifier requirement. Where appropriate, we can review whether a Japan-side notarial arrangement is feasible, but the Singapore CSP or ACRA requirements control.
United Kingdom (Companies House). For registration of a UK establishment of an overseas company, current Companies House guidance requires a certified copy of the company's constitution and, where applicable, a certified English translation. Companies House specifies who may authenticate the copy and translation, including specified company officers or representatives. Apostille Japan's own Certification of Translation Accuracy should not be presented as automatically satisfying that Companies House certifier requirement. Where our translation work is requested for such a filing, the required company-side certification arrangement must be confirmed separately.
United States. U.S. state, banking, licensing, court, and private-sector requirements vary by state and receiving organization. Do not present one corporate-document authentication or translation route as a nationwide U.S. rule.
New Zealand and the Philippines. New Zealand and Philippine corporate-document requirements vary by receiving registry, bank, court, law firm, professional adviser, or other institution. Confirm the exact written instructions rather than assigning one country-wide workflow.
For an initial inquiry, please provide the destination country, receiving authority or organization, document name, desired deadline, and whether the document has already been issued or prepared. After the initial scope check, we may ask for the receiving party's checklist or email and for the document pages necessary to confirm the workflow and quotation.
Corporate Documents Process
Five-Step Document-Specific Workflow* External authority schedules, notary availability, Legal Affairs Bureau procedures, receiving-party review, and delivery timing remain outside our control.
Pricing for Corporate Documents
Public-Document and Private-Document Fee CategoriesCorporate-document pricing depends first on whether the relevant document is an eligible public document or a private/company-prepared document and on the authentication and translation work actually required.
Non-Standard Corporate Translation: ¥6,600 (tax included) per 400 Japanese characters — for Articles of Incorporation, minutes, shareholder registers, company-prepared certificates, and similar documents, subject to scope review where needed.
Corporate Document Procurement Assistance is JPY 5,500 (tax included) per document, plus applicable disbursements, where our handling is legally and procedurally available. Legal Affairs Bureau fees and postage are third-party costs and are not included in our professional fee. Corporate registry certificates and corporate seal certificates have different request rules, so procurement availability is confirmed separately.
Official issuance fees, notary fees, domestic postage, international courier or shipping charges, and other third-party disbursements are settled separately from our professional fees and are charged at actual cost where applicable.
What We Do and Do Not Handle
Japan-Side Support and Out-of-Scope MattersOur work is limited to the Japan-side corporate-document workflow. We do not handle foreign company registration, bank account opening, KYC review, or any other foreign local procedure itself.
• Eligible corporate registry document procurement support
• Conditional corporate seal certificate procurement support
• MOFA apostille handling
• Private-document authentication handling where applicable
• Certified Translation
• Delivery
• Filing with ACRA, Companies House, the Philippine SEC, or another foreign authority
• Bank account opening
• KYC / AML approval or substantive compliance determination
• Foreign-law document drafting
• Foreign law, tax, accounting, or securities advice
• Acceptance guarantees
Corporate Documents FAQ
Eight Practical QuestionsWhich corporate registry certificate should I obtain?
The correct certificate depends on what the receiving party needs to prove. Current matters certificates, historical matters certificates, closed matters certificates, and representative matters certificates contain different categories of registered information.
If the receiving party uses general wording such as “company registry extract,” “certificate of incorporation,” “proof of corporate existence,” or “incumbency,” confirm the exact evidence it expects before ordering the Japanese record.
Can a Legal Affairs Bureau corporate registry certificate receive a MOFA apostille?
An eligible original corporate registry certificate issued by the Legal Affairs Bureau is a Japanese public document and may qualify for a direct MOFA apostille where MOFA's conditions are met and the receiving party requests authentication.
For direct MOFA apostille, the public-document original is generally required to have been issued within the preceding three months.
If a translation is attached to the public document and the combined set itself is presented for MOFA authentication, the set is treated as a private document. Confirm the authentication target before binding the translation to the original.
Can the Articles of Incorporation receive a MOFA apostille directly?
The underlying Articles of Incorporation are not a Legal Affairs Bureau-issued public certificate and therefore do not automatically follow the direct public-document route.
First confirm whether the receiving party requires the original articles, current articles, a certified copy, a signature certification, or another form.
Where authentication of a private-document element is required, a notarial certification route followed by the applicable Legal Affairs Bureau and MOFA steps may be necessary.
Can Apostille Japan obtain corporate registry certificates or corporate seal certificates?
Procurement assistance may be available, but the request rules differ.
A corporate registry certificate is a public record that anyone may request from the Legal Affairs Bureau after identifying the company and paying the applicable fee.
A corporate seal certificate is requested by the company representative, although an agent request is possible. Current Legal Affairs Bureau requirements, including the corporate seal card for applicable request methods, must be confirmed before we accept handling.
Where procurement assistance is available, our professional fee is JPY 5,500 (tax included) per document, plus applicable disbursements such as official fees and postage, which are third-party costs not included in the professional fee.
Will Apostille Japan's Certified Translation satisfy ACRA or Companies House?
Not automatically. Both authorities may specify who must certify or authenticate particular corporate documents or translations.
Current ACRA foreign-company guidance specifies permitted certifiers for certain certified copies and for translations made outside Singapore.
Current Companies House guidance for a UK establishment also specifies who must authenticate the company's constitution copy and any required English translation.
Our Certification of Translation Accuracy should not be represented as replacing those receiving-authority-specific certifier requirements.
Can you handle the foreign registration, bank account opening, or KYC review itself?
No. Our work is limited to the Japan-side corporate-document workflow.
We do not file foreign company or branch registrations, open bank accounts, act before ACRA, Companies House, the Philippine SEC, or another foreign authority, or decide whether a KYC or AML review is satisfied.
We can review the receiving party's written instructions to identify the Japan-side document work requested.
Is there a Japanese Certificate of Incumbency?
Japan does not use one statutory certificate that should automatically be described as the equivalent of every foreign Certificate of Incumbency.
Depending on the facts the receiving party wants to verify, a representative matters certificate, another corporate registry certificate, a corporate seal certificate, or a company-prepared certificate may be relevant.
The receiving party should confirm which Japanese evidence it accepts. We do not determine the legal equivalence of foreign corporate instruments.
Can overseas law firms, accounting firms, or CSPs instruct you directly?
Yes. We accept English-language enquiries from overseas legal and professional service providers for Japan-side corporate-document work, subject to engagement review.
For an initial inquiry, please provide the destination country, receiving authority or organization, document name, desired deadline, and whether the document has already been issued or prepared.
After the initial scope review, we may request the receiving party's written checklist and any company authorization or document material actually required for the engagement. See our page for legal and professional service providers for details.